Black women homophobia more do to 'insecurity', and less to do with 'Morality'.

The majority of urbanized black women, meaning those raised in urban areas, where parent was on Government subsidy, and Father absent, are animatley opposed to 'Gay black males', or 'Sissy black males' or 'Transgender black males', not do to morality, but rather do to 'insecurity', wanting to protect turf.

And I suppose this is true of other women, of different ethnic backgrounds other than just 'B' females, but for the sake of this post, want to focus on 'B' females reaction to homosexuality in 'B' males specifically, and why the hostility vs 'B' females tend to be more accepting of 'WM' gay, transgender, than that of 'B' ones.

It's all about social turf and territory, and urban black females fight for what little turf and territory they have in society. About the only turf, territory most urbanized, Government subsidized, urban black females have is their 'sexuality', outside of that have about zero influence in anything or matters.

As such they guard that sexuality like it was gold, cause it's basically the only leverage they have.

Sexuality of black urban female =

1. Welfare

2. Section 8 housing, and other fiscal benefits

3. Kids, offspring, child support

And that's territory worth protecting, cause outside of that, have about zero value or influence.

And only in America, can someone be irresponsible, yet given benefits and money, a house, apartment, and more. (In other undeveloped nations would simply starve)

But the one thing urbanized 'B' women need for any of the above to come true is 'available men'.

'Breeders', men they can breed with, and then once deed done, 'Throw away', discard.

The last thing urbanized 'B' females need is for some sissy or gayish, or Transgender 'B' male competing with them for men.

And 'B' gay males into the whole LGBTQ community compete with 'B' females in following way.

1. If gay, can have sex, and no baby to follow, no 18 years of child support...that $$$ lost to urban 'B' female.

2. Can look just as pretty, be more soft and agreeable, with no strings attached.

Urbanized 'B' females see all this as a threat to their dominance over urban males, and is why their opposition to 'B' crossdressers, gays, transgenders, is so fierce.

It has very little at all to do with biblical principle of morality, and more to do with 'self interests'.

And again, could be said the same for other women of other ethnic backgrounds, and or men.

But each group has different reason for 'fearing' the LGBTQ community, least of all being actually biblical grounds.

Cause most people who fear, despise, LGBTQ community, aren't exactly church going types, aren't exactly living biblical moral lives themselves, sleeping around, doing drugs, stealing, robbing, cheating, lying, hurting others, but yet offended by LGBTQ community??

Nope, there's other things occurring on the inside of such people, which we'll explore more of later.

Was horrified that many adult black women, living in urban areas, still think this way.

Trump vs Clinton

The other day, while at work, had discussion with 3 adult 'B' females, I told them I was probably going to vote for Donald Trump, their reaction to that, their comments, almost seemed science fiction to me. I was like 

'who put this stuff in your head, your mind?'

But sadly I kind of already know the answer to that.

When I told them I was voting for Donald Trump, as a person of color, their responses were

1. You go ahead and do that, and he's going to send you back to 'Africa'...huh?

No where in any of Trumps speeches or proposed Legitslation has Trump ever ever proposed sending American citizens back to ancestral homelands (and besides since many are mixed with many others these days, that would be hard to do, would have to leave an arm in America, send the torso to England, and rest of body to India or Africa or Asia)

But again, sadly, I was shocked at how many adult B females believe this, have been told this, not by Trump, but by others who exploit the low IQ of certain citizens for political gain.

It also showed me how prevalent this child like behavior is among many adult urban women in the city, who have been conditioned over time to settle for so little, like in plantation slave days.

I mean this is basically still the mentally of many urban B women I run into who are so eager to vote for Hillary Clinton.
Where all they want is basic security, food, and a Government Check, basically colonial plantation life from 1848.
Sadly this mindset has been handed down to people in 2016-17.
Only now they can vote.
'Just feed me, pay my bills, and I'se vote for you'.

They think this way without ever studying more important adult issues that effect actual prosperity and or nation as a whole and think others are just as content to remain so small.
And this mindset is taught to blacks by other blacks, not whites, or foreigners or other blacks raised outside of black populations, this destructive mindset comes straight from the bowls of other blacks.

No white person has ever told me I have to remain in the kitchen, but by gosh other blacks certainly have, almost daily!!

It's a sickness, and now this sickness is trying to effect fate of nation, and those of us who have long left the kitchen.

To be continued...

Dennis Prager (Jewish American) catigorizes certain humans as 'cattle', by generic color designation

Should all 'Jews' in America be referred to as 'Yellow people'?

Jew = culture, heritage, history, Yellow = generic catigorization

If I were to refer to Dennis Prager as 'Yellow', it would strip him of his religion, identity, and heritage.

Yet Dennis Prager, the Jewish talk radio hosts, has no problem doing that to citizens of African ancestry by labeling them as 'black'...what the F is that?

There was never any tribe, or culture in Africa named 'black'.

Black = void

Why would a people want to derive their identity from a void?

If defined as a void, that means others can conveniently fill that void with anything they want.

If defined as a void, it allows other people to define you

And when other people allowed to define you, that means they can recreate you in any image they want...

 Sadly, that was one of the negative consequences of slavery, where the slave owners, runners, and slaves, couldn't of been more opposite in physical features, thus easier to dehumanize slaves and justify treatment.
The slaves were stripped culture, separated from family, tribes, heritage, and language, so of course they'd seem 'dumb'.
They weren't allowed to speak native tongue, and prevented from learning English, or Spanish ect.
All they were needed for was labor and to obey.

So to say a 'white citizen' of America at the time, who'd never met a person from Africa before, there first impression would be that Africans were dumb and aloof, near retarded, but again that's the image the colonial powers recreated the Africans in once conquered on both shores.
And to this day, that image sticks, regardless of what strides Government has made in 'equal protection under the law', to this day, most 'whites' reference 'blacks', nearly as whites did 30-400 years ago, simply a mindless, shiftless, class of people whom without 'My intervention, would be lost'

Negro, black (negro is simply 'black' in Spanish) and other demeaning terms I care not to write, have been used to describe this 'void' of a people that have been gutted of culture, and recreated in original capture's ugly nightmarish image.

And to me, the term 'black' is simply a continuation of that void identity.

Even Dennis Prager, the Jewish talk radio hosts, doesn't refer to himself as 'Yellow', but rather as 'Jewish', which immediately gives him a past, a culture, and native tongue, yet Prager the Jewish radio hosts, would deny that to others by simply referring or insisting that former slaves call themselves 'black', for his convenience, but not their health of mind.

A Jewish man trying to tell others how to refer to themselves is sickening to me, as it would be if I told Chinese to simply refer to themselves as 'Red people'.

There is really no such thing as 'black culture' in America

Adaptive culture to fit in with society, maybe, or criminal street culture to get buy, that was formed out of nessisity when opportunity to work normal jobs were denied, yes, and by products of, yes, but can't really call 'slang talk', pimping, hussling ect, a 'culture' related to heritage, because it's a culture that did not exist within African societies until slaves came to new world.

Africans taken to new world, during slave era, will always be by products of new world.

Since slavery ended, many have done great, some poor, like all communities.

But mentalities, mindsets, get handed down from family to family, generation to generations, just like even today, many Southern 'whites' hold onto their civil war roots era identities, even though civil war over a century old, but you wouldn't know that when visiting some places in the South, or even other places.

Not sure why then some would not expect for former slaves, to hand down habits, mindsets, behaviors, from one generation to another, especially if isolated to one community, I mean you can only learn from those around you, same fears, myths, slang, dialect ect.

In closing, many former slaves or OK with being called 'black' and prefer that over other just as meaningless generic terms.

Dennis Prager also objects to the term 'African American', can't understand why term used.

Cause again, Prager is 'Jewish', so has his heritage intact, and the colonial mindset in him is disturbed anytime former slaves are reminded where there ancestor's came from, as if afraid will reclaim original tribal identities, rise up and revolt, which was original fear of capture's.

Will continue this post at a later date.